​
Memory Integration for Arc’s LangGraph Flow

This document outlines potential approaches for integrating memory capabilities into Arc’s simulation workflow, to be implemented after core functionality is stable.

​
Current Memory Architecture

Arc currently has two primary forms of “memory”:
  1. Temporal Knowledge Graph: Arc’s fundamental memory system, capturing relationships between code, decisions, and context over time.
  2. Simulation Results: Each simulation produces valuable insights about potential impacts, but these insights aren’t systematically retained or leveraged for future simulations.

​
Potential Memory Integration Approaches

​
1. Simulation-Specific Memory

Memory focused solely on improving simulations:
  • Simulation Pattern Recognition: Store patterns of code changes that led to specific types of failures
  • Service Impact History: Track how specific services respond to different types of changes
  • Risk Score Calibration: Adjust risk scores based on historical accuracy

​
2. Holistic System Memory

A more comprehensive approach integrating simulation with the broader knowledge graph:
  • Decision Trail Integration: Connect simulation results to the “why” behind code changes
  • Impact Verification: Compare predicted impacts from simulations with actual observed impacts
  • Knowledge Enrichment: Use simulation results to enrich the knowledge graph with “what-if” scenarios

​
Practical Implementation Considerations

​
What to Store in Memory

The most valuable elements to store would be:
  1. Simulation Contexts: The code changes, affected services, and scenarios that were simulated
  2. Prediction Accuracy: How well the simulation predicted actual outcomes
  3. Developer Decisions: What actions developers took based on simulation results
  4. Resolution Patterns: How issues identified in simulations were ultimately resolved

​
How to Leverage Memory

Memory could enhance the workflow in several ways:
  1. Contextual Recommendations: “Similar changes caused latency issues in the past”
  2. Risk Assessment Calibration: “Our predictions for this service have been 85% accurate”
  3. Resolution Suggestions: “When this happened before, developers fixed it by…”
  4. Change Impact Validation: “This change is similar to one that affected 3 downstream services”

​
Developer and Customer Experience Considerations

​
Value to Workflow

The most valuable memory integrations would:
  1. Reduce Cognitive Load: Automatically surface relevant historical context
  2. Increase Confidence: Provide evidence-based risk assessments
  3. Accelerate Resolution: Suggest proven solutions to similar problems
  4. Enable Learning: Help teams improve their system understanding over time

​
Ease of Use

For optimal developer experience:
  1. Transparent Integration: Memory should feel like a natural extension of the workflow
  2. Non-Intrusive Suggestions: Provide insights without disrupting the development flow
  3. Explainable Recommendations: Always explain why a particular memory is relevant
  4. Progressive Disclosure: Surface basic insights by default, with deeper context available on demand

​
Connecting to Arc’s Core Thesis

Aligning with Arc’s core thesis: “Arc is the local-first ‘what-if’ engine for software: it captures the why behind every line of code, then simulates how new changes will ripple through your system before you hit Merge.” The most aligned memory implementation would:
  1. Strengthen the “Why”: Connect simulation results to the decision trails in the knowledge graph
  2. Improve “What-If” Accuracy: Learn from past simulations to make future predictions more accurate
  3. Enhance Pre-Merge Confidence: Provide historical context that helps developers make better decisions
Rather than implementing a separate memory system within the LangGraph agent:
  1. Bidirectional Integration with Knowledge Graph:
    • Pull relevant historical context from the knowledge graph into simulations
    • Push simulation results back into the knowledge graph as “potential impact” relationships
  2. Simulation Outcome Tracking:
    • Store simulation attestations in a structured way
    • After changes are merged, compare actual impacts with predicted impacts
    • Use this feedback loop to improve future simulations
  3. Context-Aware Explanations:
    • Enhance explanation generation with relevant historical context
    • “This change is similar to one made by Alice last month that affected the authentication service”
    • “The last three times this service was modified, we saw latency increases in the API gateway”

​
Implementation Plan (Future PR)

  1. Schema Definition:
    • Define a schema for storing simulation results in the knowledge graph
    • Create relationships between simulations, code changes, and actual outcomes
  2. Retrieval Mechanism:
    • Implement a retrieval system to pull relevant historical simulations
    • Use hybrid retrieval (graph traversal + vector similarity) for optimal results
  3. Feedback Loop:
    • Create a mechanism to validate simulation predictions against actual outcomes
    • Use this data to improve future simulation accuracy
  4. Enhanced Explanations:
    • Update the explanation generation to incorporate historical context
    • Provide more nuanced risk assessments based on historical patterns

​
Conclusion

Memory integration represents a significant opportunity to enhance Arc’s value proposition by creating a learning system that improves over time. By connecting simulations to the broader knowledge graph, we can provide developers with increasingly valuable insights that help them make better decisions before merging code changes. This enhancement should be implemented after core functionality is stable, as a separate PR focused specifically on memory capabilities.